Tuesday, January 27, 2009

ALA TFOEMP

As some of you may know, The American Library Association (ALA) charged the Task Force on Electronic Member Participation (TFOEMP) with investigating ways in which ALA members may become more engaged with the association without necessarily having to attend the midwinter meetings and annual conferences.

You may read the full report of the task force on their web page at http://tinyurl.com/7jnhhd.

There are 16 recommendations in the report. The recommendations were voted on individually at the Council meeting on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 in Denver, CO. Voting went as follows.

Recommendation # 1: approved
Recommendation # 2: approved
Recommendation # 3: approved
Recommendation # 4: approved
The meeting ran over the the scheduled time, so we will resume the discussion at Council III tomorrow.

There weren't many questions about the first three recommendations. Recommendation #4, however, called for the elimination of a policy that governs virtual membership in the association. The recommendation had some internal inconsistency by calling for the elimination of the policy, then referring only to ALA-level committees. However the policy covers division and round table committees as well and will therefore leave those groups no means for appointing virtual members. There was too little opposition to prevent the approval of this recommendation.

Interestingly, the members of Council apparently had little idea about what we were voting for when we voted for recommendation #4. Today, (it is now Wednesday and we are in Council session III) we voted to reconsider #4 and after passing that motion, amended significantly the language before finally approving - again - the recommendation.

Recommendation #5: approved.

In the interest of time, we have agreed to consider the remaining recommendations (#6 through #16) together as a group and refer the document to the ALA Executive Board for appropriate action.
Share/Save/Bookmark

Monday, January 26, 2009

Facebook and relationships

I heard this first on Fox News (why do I continue to watch this), but the story might be of some interest to those on Facebook. Edward Richardson has apparently killed his wife because of a change she made to her Facebook status - she went from being "married" to "single." However, this appears not to be the first such case; Wayne Forrester killed his wife for the same reason some months ago. I am not blaming the victime, but didn't they think, perhapas, of having some sort of conversations with their spouses before making such declarations to the world? Irrespective of the way you feel about the person now, at least have the decency to let them know (before they see it on Facebook) that the relationship is over. This might even be worse than breaking up via text message - at least the text gives some notification.
Share/Save/Bookmark

ALA Executive Board Candidates

The candidates for ALA Executive Board each spoke about why we should vote for them:

Below are some key words or phrases quoted directly from their five-minute statements:

J. Linda Williams: lots of ALA Committee work, including current member of BARC. Interested in diversity initiatives. Salary and pay equity; patron privacy; intellectual freedom. We need to be proactive. Developing opportunities for all within ALA.

John Sandstrom: GLBRT Councilor. Honored to be nominated. PATRIOT ACT, librarians as babysitters. Economic downturn. Do you believe? librarians can turn the world around. Pay equity with like positions in other industries. diversity is important. advocacy.

Pat Hogan: Advocacy, collaboration, organizational excellence, fianance.
Champoion grassroots advocacy. Multi-type library works with all levels of staff. Communication. Work experience is relaity-based. Be a part of the "library voice."

Sylvia Norton: passionate about work. director of small hospital library; high school librarian; advocate for library and librarians; influence policy-makers in the state.

Courtney L. Young: energetic and active; accessible; diversity; understand the new members (through NMRT) how do they get involved and navigate the complex organization. Will be an ambassador. not as experienced as others, but record of experience is solid. election would allow for the development of leaders.

Steven L. Matthews: diversity and commitment. school librarian. 21st Century learner. in search of what will work; consider the needs of hte user. President Obama. Everyone can fulfill. ALA is complex; values are stellar.

Marilyn Hinshaw: conscious devotion to all things library; former chair of BARC; experience with geographic diversity as well as any other style; not out there for my gain.

Ling Hwey Jeng: ALA member since '84; councilor for 7 years; success of communities; diversity; community is globalizing; browning of our society; advocacy and collaboration; quality of libary education; literacy - language, information and computer literacy; good observer; don't always think inside the box; work for right solutions and don't settle for easy ones; inclusiveness;
vital, viable and renewable for the next generations.

Overall comments: It seems that everyone wants to demonstrate that they have worked with multi-type libraries (academic, public, special, and school), and diversity.

Question: Only two councilors attended the MLK Sunrise breakfast.
Share/Save/Bookmark

ALA-APA Public Library Certification

At the ALA-APA Council session this morning, there was a rather lengthy discussion about the need for and value of the ALA-APA Certified Public Library Administrator (CPLA) program. This program has had nine librarians complete the program and earn the "right to use the CPLA(r) designation. What does the CPLA do for librarians. We know, from the ALA-APA office that librarians who register for the program do so for career advancemenet or professional development. What is interesting about this program is that the certification isn't really recognized by many libraries and as one person noted, the libraries in his state look for for degrees than they do for certification and as a result, he enrolled in an MPA degree program.

Lots of discussion about the requirements for the program - especially the requirement to have had three years of professional library experience as a manager to qualify. A new manager (less than one year in her position) argued, rightfully in my opinion, that new librarians/managers can bring just as much to the discussion as more seasoned librarians.

What do you think? Should there be a library certification program? Would you participate? Why would you participate? Does certification matter in your area?
Share/Save/Bookmark

Sunday, January 25, 2009

ALA Council - Executive Board Report - elections

Susan DiMattia, chair of the ALA Nominating Committee, reported on the nomination process for the 2009 elections. Over 120 names were initially suggested for councilor-at-large positions. Of these, 57 names will appear on the ballot. In addition, some petition candidates will also be up for election or re-election. In a future post, I will list the names of those I endorse for Council.

There were 45 names initially considered for the ALA President-elect spot. For a host of reasons, some potential candidates declined to run. Kenton Oliver and Roberta Stevens were approved as the candidates for ALA president-elect. There were no petition candidates.

There was a question about why there isn't more outreach to get library school students involved in Council? Although this committee didn't do much outreach, they will suggest that future committees do so. A brief video has been created in which some current councilors highlight the reasons to become active on Council and what the benefits are. The video will soon be available on YouTube and linked from the ALA web page.
Share/Save/Bookmark

ALA Council - Executive Board Report - finances

I am at the Midwinter Meeting of the American Library Association (ALA) in Denver, Co. This morning (Sunday) I attended my first set of Council meetings as a councilor-at-large.

Jim Neal, Chair of the ALA Budget Analysis and Review Committee (BARC) gave an overview of the ALA finances. Overall, Jim noted that although ALA has less revenues at the end of the first quarter 2009 (11/30/08), this is not unusual for this time of year. In fact, Jim noted that in other areas, ALA has increased revenues significantly. Two areas of note were in conference registrations and in grants. I find it somewhat comforting that there is an increase in conference registration especially in light of the budget cuts that may of us are facing at our institutions - and often in the area of travel and professional development. Jim credits the financial management skills of the staff at ALA headquarters for their stewardship and believes strongly that they will continue to manage ALA funds effectively to continue conducting the business of the association.

Dan Bradbury, Senior Trustee, reported on the state of the ALA endowments. Although endowments have decreased by more than 20%, he believes that, based on history, we will come out stronger when the economy turns around. ALA has made some changes to the manner in which investments can be made to allow more flexibility. In response to a question, Mr. Bradbury noted that ALA will not, at the moment, invest in gold as the current value of our endowment will not support such an investment.
Share/Save/Bookmark

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

President Obama's inauguration speech

It sounds great saying, "President Obama." I never really liked saying, "President Bush," and would often refer to him as, "Mr. Bush."

Although all the politicos have noted that the inaugural speech was not as powerful as others he has given, it is still a good speech, reprinted here from the ABC News.

President Barack Obama Delivers Inaugural Address at US Capitol in Washington, D.C.

Jan. 20, 2009

Full transcript as prepared for delivery of President Barack Obama's inaugural remarks on Jan. 20, 2009, at the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C.

My fellow citizens:

I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors. I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition.

Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet, every so often the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms. At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because We the People have remained faithful to the ideals of our forbearers, and true to our founding documents.

So it has been. So it must be with this generation of Americans.

That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood. Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age. Homes have been lost; jobs shed; businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly; our schools fail too many; and each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet.

These are the indicators of crisis, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable but no less profound is a sapping of confidence across our land - a nagging fear that America's decline is inevitable, and that the next generation must lower its sights.

Today I say to you that the challenges we face are real. They are serious and they are many.

They will not be met easily or in a short span of time. But know this, America - they will be met. On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord.

On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics.

We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things. The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free, and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.

In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of short-cuts or settling for less. It has not been the path for the faint-hearted - for those who prefer leisure over work, or seek only the pleasures of riches and fame. Rather, it has been the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things - some celebrated but more often men and women obscure in their labor, who have carried us up the long, rugged path towards prosperity and freedom.

For us, they packed up their few worldly possessions and traveled across oceans in search of a new life.

For us, they toiled in sweatshops and settled the West; endured the lash of the whip and plowed the hard earth.

For us, they fought and died, in places like Concord and Gettysburg; Normandy and Khe Sahn. Time and again these men and women struggled and sacrificed and worked till their hands were raw so that we might live a better life. They saw America as bigger than the sum of our individual ambitions; greater than all the differences of birth or wealth or faction.

This is the journey we continue today. We remain the most prosperous, powerful nation on Earth. Our workers are no less productive than when this crisis began. Our minds are no less inventive, our goods and services no less needed than they were last week or last month or last year. Our capacity remains undiminished. But our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions - that time has surely passed. Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America.

For everywhere we look, there is work to be done. The state of the economy calls for action, bold and swift, and we will act - not only to create new jobs, but to lay a new foundation for growth. We will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together. We will restore science to its rightful place, and wield technology's wonders to raise health care's quality and lower its cost. We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories. And we will transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age. All this we can do. And all this we will do.

Now, there are some who question the scale of our ambitions - who suggest that our system cannot tolerate too many big plans. Their memories are short. For they have forgotten what this country has already done; what free men and women can achieve when imagination is joined to common purpose, and necessity to courage.

What the cynics fail to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath them - that the stale political arguments that have consumed us for so long no longer apply. The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works - whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified. Where the answer is yes, we intend to move forward. Where the answer is no, programs will end. And those of us who manage the public's dollars will be held to account - to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day - because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.

Nor is the question before us whether the market is a force for good or ill. Its power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched, but this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control - and that a nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous. The success of our economy has always depended not just on the size of our Gross Domestic Product, but on the reach of our prosperity; on our ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart - not out of charity, but because it is the surest route to our common good.

As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our Founding Fathers, faced with perils we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man, a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake. And so to all other peoples and governments who are watching today, from the grandest capitals to the small village where my father was born: know that America is a friend of each nation and every man, woman, and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity, and that we are ready to lead once more.

Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks, but with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.

We are the keepers of this legacy. Guided by these principles once more, we can meet those new threats that demand even greater effort - even greater cooperation and understanding between nations. We will begin to responsibly leave Iraq to its people, and forge a hard-earned peace in Afghanistan. With old friends and former foes, we will work tirelessly to lessen the nuclear threat, and roll back the specter of a warming planet. We will not apologize for our way of life, nor will we waver in its defense, and for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken; you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you.

For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus - and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace.

To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect.

To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict, or blame their society's ills on the West - know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy. To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history; but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.

To the people of poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to make your farms flourish and let clean waters flow; to nourish starved bodies and feed hungry minds. And to those nations like ours that enjoy relative plenty, we say we can no longer afford indifference to suffering outside our borders; nor can we consume the world's resources without regard to effect. For the world has changed, and we must change with it.

As we consider the road that unfolds before us, we remember with humble gratitude those brave Americans who, at this very hour, patrol far-off deserts and distant mountains. They have something to tell us today, just as the fallen heroes who lie in Arlington whisper through the ages.

We honor them not only because they are guardians of our liberty, but because they embody the spirit of service; a willingness to find meaning in something greater than themselves. And yet, at this moment - a moment that will define a generation - it is precisely this spirit that must inhabit us all.

For as much as government can do and must do, it is ultimately the faith and determination of the American people upon which this nation relies. It is the kindness to take in a stranger when the levees break, the selflessness of workers who would rather cut their hours than see a friend lose their job which sees us through our darkest hours. It is the firefighter's courage to storm a stairway filled with smoke, but also a parent's willingness to nurture a child, that finally decides our fate.

Our challenges may be new. The instruments with which we meet them may be new. But those values upon which our success depends - hard work and honesty, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism - these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history. What is demanded then is a return to these truths. What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility - a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation, and the world, duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task.

This is the price and the promise of citizenship.

This is the source of our confidence - the knowledge that God calls on us to shape an uncertain destiny.

This is the meaning of our liberty and our creed - why men and women and children of every race and every faith can join in celebration across this magnificent mall, and why a man whose father less than sixty years ago might not have been served at a local restaurant can now stand before you to take a most sacred oath.

So let us mark this day with remembrance, of who we are and how far we have traveled. In the year of America's birth, in the coldest of months, a small band of patriots huddled by dying campfires on the shores of an icy river. The capital was abandoned. The enemy was advancing. The snow was stained with blood. At a moment when the outcome of our revolution was most in doubt, the father of our nation ordered these words be read to the people:

"Let it be told to the future world...that in the depth of winter, when nothing but hope and virtue could survive...that the city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, came forth to meet [it]."

America. In the face of our common dangers, in this winter of our hardship, let us remember these timeless words. With hope and virtue, let us brave once more the icy currents, and endure what storms may come. Let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back nor did we falter; and with eyes fixed on the horizon and God's grace upon us, we carried forth that great gift of freedom and delivered it safely to future generations.


Share/Save/Bookmark

Monday, January 19, 2009

Doing your job

I read with some delight the comments by Mike C in response to the recent US Airways crash...er, sorry..."emergency landing," being dubbed "Miracle on the Hudson," and all the praise being given to pilot Sullenberger. I couldn't agree more with Mike. It is great that "Sully," as a result of his training and skill, saved the lives of the passengers and crew on board, but was he not just doing his job? Would we have expected him to do something differently that would have, perhaps, ended more tragically? Mike writes, "Almost anyone who is not already a serial killer who does something notable receives book and movie offers, appearances on talk shows and fame and fortune. Paris Hilton may be the most egregious example of someone who became famous for being famous." While it is true that we often tend to notice and comment on the bad more so than on the good, we do say thanks to those who are deserving and give praise when praise is warranted.

This discussion about people doing their jobs reminded me of a conversation I had with a friend at dinner just yesterday. We had a lovely dinner at one of my favorite restaurants in Philadelphia - at which we tipped the server generously (she deserved it!) We left the restaurant and walked to the garage where I had parked my car. Unrelated to the point of this post, we noticed the sign that read, "oversized vehicles will be charged more." Among the oversized vehicles listed was the "Range Ruler." I am not an expert on car makes and models, but I have never heard of a Range Ruler. I'll have to look that up this morning. Anyway, as we waited for the attendant, my friend asked me if and how much I plan on tipping the attendant. Perhaps because I have become jaded by thinking that everyone now believes they should be compensated above and beyond what is normal (see praise and hero status for Sully as an example) or that as a society we believe that should be case, I immediately replied, "Nothing. Isn't he just doing his job?" My friend turned to me and said, "But wasn't the waitress just doing her job and she got a tip." Hmmmm. Where do you draw the line?

Troubled by the tipping question, then reading Mike C.'s post this morning, I decided to find out (perhaps too late) when is it appropriate to tip. Well, Miss Manners doesn't have her book online (unfortunately) but several other people have prepared guides to help determine when and in what amount you should tip. The Original Tipping page has a guide for US and international tipping. TipGuide.org provides a handy reference as well.

I even went so far as to get a definition of tip, from the US Code of Federal Regulations. It reads:
"A tip is a sum presented by a customer as a gift or gratuity in recognition of some service performed for him. It is to be distinguished from payment of a charge, if any, made for the service. Whether a tip is to be given, and its amount, are matters determined solely by the customer, and generally he has the right to determine who shall be the recipient of his gratuity."

I consider what we do here in the library to be a service, but there is no guide to tipping the librarian. Are we not deserving of a tip when we provide excellent service? What makes the service we provide any different from the service the waitress, the parking attendant, or the teacher (OK, I'll give you the first two, but librarians ARE teachers) provides? Should we put up a tip jar at the circulation and reference desks? Are librarians praised by getting a book published or an interview with Matt Lauer when they provide services "above and beyond" what might be considered normal? I think not.

Don't get me wrong. I am not necessarily advocating tips for librarians - or for any profession. I just need some help in understanding when tipping is actually necessary and when is it appropriate to bestow hero status on someone for doing what we would expect them to do - their job!

So what are your thoughts about tipping? What are your thoughts about "Sully?"

The parking attendant got a tip, BTW.

Addendum: I posted an abbreviated version of this on my facebook page, and a colleague commented, "Hmmm. Look at the number of times that pilots land airliners. Then look at the number of times they make water landings. Landing on dry land is their job. Landing in water is their nightmare. Almost always accompanied by loss of life. So, perhaps he was just "doing his job" but if so he did it in an extraordinary way."


Share/Save/Bookmark

Friday, January 9, 2009

Palin cleans up



Snippets from an interview with Alaska Governor, Sarah Palin, by John Ziegler for an upcoming documentary.

It would seem that Ms Palin has learned a lot from her now more than 4 months in the national and international spotlight. Of course, what we don't know is how scripted this interview is and whether or not she had time to prepare her responses. However, if she demonstrated this much composure during the campaign I wonder if the results would have been different.
Share/Save/Bookmark

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Budget woes at Princeton

I reprint below, in its entirety, a letter university president Shirley M. Tilghman sent to the entire staff at the university today.

So we have finally admitted that even the mighty can fall, yet still have difficulty admitting just how far. It would be great if, in fact, our endowment had only lost 11%, but where other peer institutions have announced cuts much earlier and others such as Harvard and Penn have shared a more realistic (albeit harsh) outlook, we remain "confident." Don't get me wrong, I think confidence is a great trait to have and I am pleased that our administrators are confident in the outlook, but I also wonder how realistic this outlook is.

I couldn't help but compare President Tilghman's letter to that from Richard Levin, president at Yale University since both letters mention salary increases for employees. It seems Yale has a definition ($75,000) of what Princeton only considers the "highest compensated staff." I guess I don't know whether I want to be considered among this possibly elite group until the salary pool is [not] announced.

The mood here among my colleagues this morning is still good and many are thankful that there is still some optimism. They are also grateful that we are not, at least at the moment, letting anyone go. I suppose there is always something to be thankful for.

The letter...


From: Shirley M. Tilghman
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 9:06 AM
To: allemp@Princeton.EDU
Subject: Update on Princeton's Response to the Economic Downturn

January 8, 2009

To the Princeton campus community:

The New Year is traditionally a time for reviewing the past and anticipating the future. As we begin 2009, our thoughts cannot help but turn to the impact of the world’s turbulent economy. Many of you have asked me how Princeton has been affected and what lies ahead for our University. I want to take advantage of the pause between semesters to provide you with some information about Princeton’s economic condition and share with you my perspective on the months and years ahead. I have also had an opportunity to discuss these matters at length with the Trustees, who have been very supportive of the actions we are taking.

Let me begin by observing that despite the turmoil outside the FitzRandolph Gates, the University is flourishing. Professor Paul Krugman of the Department of Economics and the Woodrow Wilson School received the Nobel Prize in economics, and members of the classes of 2008 and 2009 earned three Rhodes and one Marshall Scholarship to study in the United Kingdom. These widely reported achievements were only the tip of the iceberg: faculty members and students throughout the University continue to perform brilliantly and garner national and international honors.

Moreover, our loyal alumni, parents and friends set a new record for Annual Giving last June and the Aspire campaign is making excellent progress, highlighted this year by the magnificent gift of Gerry Andlinger ’52 to launch the new Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment. The Peter B. Lewis Library opened this fall, attracting rave reviews from both architecture critics and Princeton students, who have already made it one of the most popular study spaces on campus. A few blocks away, graceful and light-filled Sherrerd Hall has quickly become a campus landmark for the Department of Operations Research and Financial Engineering and the Center for Information Technology Policy. And this fall the women’s soccer team celebrated the inaugural year of the stunningly beautiful Roberts Stadium with an Ivy League title. I am truly grateful to be part of such a vibrant and healthy university, especially during such difficult times.

At the same time, Princeton is not immune from the effects of the turmoil gripping the world economy. In particular, our endowment, which has grown robustly in past years and now supplies more than 45% of the University’s operating revenue, has significantly lost value since the beginning of the current fiscal year last July 1. Through October 31, the University’s endowment had declined by 11%, based upon our standard reporting protocols, using information that is the best available as of the reporting date. However, given that values for non-marketable investments, which comprise more than half of the endowment portfolio, are reported only with lagged estimates until the end of each fiscal year, it is certain that 11% understates the actual economic loss the endowment suffered through October. And, of course, financial markets have continued to decline since then. Although we cannot know what the next six months will bring, we believe it is prudent for the University to plan for the possibility that its endowment will have declined by 25% at the end of the fiscal year.

Declines in endowment value do not automatically reduce the endowment’s contribution to next year’s operating budget. On the contrary, our policy is to increase that contribution by 5% each year, as long as the amount falls between 4.0% and 5.75% of the value of the endowment, as determined on June 30 of the prior fiscal year. When our rate falls below that range we make upward adjustments in spending and when it rises above that range, we must make downward adjustments. On five occasions in the past 11 years we have made special upward adjustments, and this year our spending rate is comfortably within the range at 4.76%. Looking ahead, however, a 25% decline in the value of the endowment would put our spending rate well above the upper limit of our range. To bring spending closer to the upper limit, we are planning to reduce the endowment’s contribution to the University’s general funds operating budget next year by $50 million. Even with this reduction, our spending rate would remain outside our target range, exceeding 6%, but we believe this spending level represents a measured response to the current economic climate. If circumstances change between now and June, we have the flexibility to modify this plan.

Fortunately, Princeton planned conservatively during the good years, knowing full well that markets go down as well as up. Though this year’s downturn is deeper than what anyone could have imagined, Princeton will be able to protect its key assets. Foremost among these is our human capital—the students, faculty and staff who are the vital heart of a great scholarly enterprise. One of Princeton’s signature commitments is our unsurpassed financial aid program, which led the way in 2001 as the first university program to replace student loans with grants. We are completely committed to meeting the full financial need of the students who will be admitted this year, as well as currently enrolled students, some of whose families have already been affected by the recession. In addition, we have approved some modest improvements to Princeton’s aid package this year, reducing the summer earnings requirement at a time when jobs will likely be hard to find. Happily, we have been able to fully meet an unanticipated increase of ~$5 million in demand for financial aid this year because of the extraordinary performance of the 2008 Annual Giving campaign.

It is also essential that we continue to recruit and retain the finest faculty in the world. In the past few years we have been enhancing our strength in high priority areas such as neuroscience, the creative and performing arts, African American studies and international relations, as well as sustaining excellence in disciplines where we are already preeminent. We should not put at risk the foundations we have so recently laid. Consequently, for this year the University will continue the searches for new faculty members that have already been authorized, with the goal of attracting to Princeton new colleagues who will sustain and enhance the quality of our research and teaching. However, any new requests to initiate or reopen a faculty search will be carefully reviewed by Dean of the Faculty David Dobkin, so that we can direct our limited resources to our most pressing needs.

In recognition of the important role that the University’s administration plays in our preeminence, we have been making strategic investments in our staff over the last several years to strengthen our effectiveness as a university. To reach our operating budget target for fiscal year 2010, we will need to slow this growth considerably. Beginning immediately, all new searches for term, temporary and regular employment must be approved in advance by a review committee composed of Provost Christopher Eisgruber, Executive Vice President Mark Burstein and Vice President for Human Resources Lianne Sullivan-Crowley. The committee will also review the status of searches currently under way to determine if any could be placed on hold. This scrutiny of new hiring will allow us to sustain our commitment to the dedicated staff currently working at Princeton.

If we are to devote Princeton’s resources to our core priorities and protect our human capital, all of us will have to work together to reduce expenses on other fronts. As you know, we have been reviewing the University’s 10-year capital plan, and earlier this semester we announced a series of project deferrals that reduced the cost of the plan by more than $300 million. While we continue to review opportunities for savings in the capital plan, we will complete the two major construction projects already under way; the exciting renewal of the Butler College dormitories and the new chemistry building on Washington Road. To ensure that we are poised to rebound rapidly when the economic climate improves, we will continue to design and seek public approvals for high priority projects such as the new home for the Lewis Center for the Arts, the new psychology and neuroscience buildings and the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, but authorization to begin all construction and renovation projects will be made on a case-by-case basis, contingent on funding. The projects in the capital plan are critical to the future of the University, and we are hopeful that they will move forward as soon as economic conditions allow. Until that happens, however, we need to adjust our expectations appropriately, and I appreciate the support and good will that we have received from those whose projects have already been affected.

We must also look for ways to conduct all aspects of the University’s operations more efficiently. All non-personnel administrative budget allocations will be reduced by 5% in fiscal year 2010. Furthermore, departments with restricted endowed funds must plan for an 8% decrease in their annual allocations from these funds, and it is possible that further decreases will be needed in fiscal year 2011. While it may provide small comfort today, it is helpful to remind ourselves that even with this decrease in income, the payout from endowment units in fiscal year 2010 will be 50% higher than it was just four years ago. For this we have to thank the tremendous success of PRINCO, our investment company, whose skillful investing allowed us to significantly increase endowment spending in 2006 and 2007.

In order to help managers achieve the savings that these decreases require, I have asked Mark Burstein and Vice President for Finance and Treasurer Carolyn Ainslie to design a set of tools that will assist departments in reducing their budgets. These include everything from renegotiating procurement contracts to reducing the amount of printed materials. A website that describes the cost-savings initiatives can be found at http://www.princeton.edu/savings . I also ask anyone with good ideas to submit them to Mark Burstein via a suggestion box on that website. I am confident that we will be able to call upon the ingenuity and competitiveness of the entire Princeton community to help us identify and deliver ways in which we can reduce non-essential costs.

I have also asked Provost Eisgruber to collaborate with academic units to ensure that all the funds they manage are being directed to core priorities rather than more discretionary ones. Unfortunately, the economic constraints confronting us will require that we reduce the number of visiting faculty and fellows whom we might otherwise bring to campus to enrich our scholarly community, and Dean Dobkin will work with academic units to minimize such appointments next year. All of us in Nassau Hall recognize that needs and opportunities will vary from one department to the next, and we will work with chairs and managers to implement these budgetary initiatives in ways that are sensitive to the differences among units.

I am very grateful this year to the members of the Priorities Committee, chaired by Provost Eisgruber, who have worked so thoughtfully and flexibly for the last several months to craft a set of budgetary recommendations during a time when the economic landscape was changing day-by-day. That committee, which is charged with recommending an operating budget for the University each year, includes representatives of the faculty, staff and the undergraduate and graduate student bodies.

The committee will bring to the Board of Trustees for approval later this month three important recommendations. First, the members will propose that in light of the very modest funding that will be available for increases in faculty and staff salaries next year, the largest percentage increases should be directed to the University’s lowest paid employees. To accomplish this important goal, the maximum increases for tenured faculty and the highest compensated staff will be capped at $2,000. Second, in recognition of the need to sustain the quality of the Graduate School at Princeton, the Priorities Committee will recommend a 3% increase to graduate student stipends. Third, the committee will recommend a 2.9% increase in the undergraduate fee package for the 2009-10 year, the lowest percentage increase since 1966. This increase, which will not affect any student on financial aid, reflects the fact that many of our tuition-paying families are experiencing financial setbacks of their own.

The committee’s proposed budget also recognizes the University’s confidence in the goals of our five-year Aspire campaign. The campaign continues energetically in its second year, and we plan to adhere to the announced timeline for it. The initiatives embodied within the campaign are the University’s highest priorities, and I am thankful for the energy that Princeton’s volunteers, donors and friends have brought to the achievement of these goals. A campaign is a marathon, not a sprint, and I remain very optimistic about the prospects for success.

The extraordinary depth of the economic downturn, coupled with the uncertainty of predicting its duration or impact, make it likely that we are at the beginning of a multiyear budgetary adjustment. As this academic year progresses, my colleagues and I will continue to watch economic developments carefully so that Princeton can adjust its response as circumstances warrant. All of us hope that an economic recovery will come sooner rather than later, but it is likely that this year’s downturn will require creative planning for not only the upcoming budget year but later ones. The University will weather this storm and emerge from it even stronger than ever if all of us pull together and contribute our energy, understanding and good will. While all of us would prefer a different set of challenges and a sunnier economic forecast, I am cheered by the commitment and spirit that the entire Princeton community has already shown in these difficult times. I cannot imagine a better group of partners with whom to approach the tasks ahead, and I very much look forward to working with all of you in the New Year.

Sincerely,


Shirley M. Tilghman

Share/Save/Bookmark

Goodbye Mr. Bush




I'm not sure if there is anything else to say.

We all could come up with our own top 10 lists of our favorite Bushisms but this clip demonstrates that Mr Bush doesn't even have to speak to provide humor. Too bad we find so much humor in our leader.
Share/Save/Bookmark

Thursday, January 1, 2009

Happy New Year!

New Year, New Laws...

As I reported previously here, people create a lot of lists at the end of the year. The New Year is also a time for many new laws to take effect. Here are a few worth mentioning:

- Massachusetts becomes the 12th state to do away with criminal penalties for light-weight (1 oz or less) possession, enacting a $100 fine instead of misdemeanor criminal charges.

- It is now illegal for single people to adopt children in Arkansas. The law was designed to prevent gays and lesbians from adopting, but obviously has much wider impact. The ACLU is challenging the law. Definitely one to watch. But this law was designed to "protect the children," and to stop the "gay agenda" that's going around the country. I'm pleased the state would much rather take care of the children than have caring families adopt them.

- A law in California guarantees that if California property owners plant a tree before a neighbor installs solar panels on their roof, then the neighbor can't require the tree to be cut or trimmed, even if it grows to cast shade on the panels.

My favorite:
- Don't text while you drive in California. The article rightly asks, "why would you need a law to tell you this is dangerous?" The report on NBC News also quoted a young woman, "I've almost rear-ended a few people while I was texting." Apparently this televised admission isn't enough to get her arrested. Perhaps she'll be rear-ended the next time she's out driving.

Read a roundup of some of these laws here or here.

Be sure to remain safe - and legal!
Share/Save/Bookmark