Document Delivery Services Manager
Brigham Young University
Patron-toPatron lending services: an idea.
What does a patron do when a library cannot fill a request for an item? Item could be either too new, too popular, or too specialized (for example).
Options:
- add name to queue;
- visit another library;
- patron can purchase;
- back to ILL; borrow from a friend;
- go to the source;
- library can purchase another copy.
With patron-to-patron borrowing, the library can connect the patron with an available copy of the book. Precedent already exists with sites like:
Sites like LibraryThing demonstrate that there many copies of popular items already available widely and this can be used as a source to locate items.
Liabilities
- legal: Are there copyright violations or other legal obstacles?
- time: How much time and effort is involved in getting this service up and running
- privacy/security: this is an opt-in service
- damage/loss: is item is lot or damaged, the same rules as "traditional" ILL will apply.
- borrowing/lending: will there be more borrowers than lenders? What will be the incentive to be a lender?
- opting out: when patrons move or otherwise choose, they can opt out.
- Save $7 on borrowing costs and $10 on lending costs (average ILL costs now $27, so there is an actual saving)
- holds at the library decreases
- saves on acquisitions costs by not having to purchase as many as would have normally purchased
- good PR for the library
- be on solid legal footing
- create a database of titles, email and usage data
- develop a budget for incentives
- updates to database (new titles, users, potential lenders; lender statistics; titles no longer needed)
Should there be a ratings systems on lenders?
This could be great for reserve loans
How can we integrate with other social networking sites that are already prime for a service like this?